Potential for Unintended  Legislative Changes
  

 Overview of Process

 Submitting Issues

 Panel Process

 Analysis

 Content/form of  submissions

 Outcomes and  Communication

 Penalties and Interest

 Disputes and Rulings  Processes

 


www.rewriteadvisory.govt.nz

FYI Issues Log Panel Statement Submission Form Issues Log Home Contact Us Background
 

  The Issues Log






















 
Issue:  EE 21, EG 11

Submission Number 62
Submitter

Jane Wakefield - PricewaterhouseCoopers

Section / Provision Income Tax Act 2007

 

Section / Provision Income Tax Act 2004

EE 21

Date Received

10/04/08
Description of issue

1994 Act – EG 11 provides that the number of months relevant to the calculation of the depreciation loss in relation to a pool of assets is limited to the number of months in the taxpayer’s Income year. 

2004 Act - EE 21 Provides for the same formula but under subsection (7)(b) the number of months taken into account is limited to those in which the taxpayer owns “the item”, uses the item, or has the item available for use for any purpose

The number of months to which the formula relates is completely altered in 2004 Act focusing in that instance on an item, presumably one of the pooled assets.

The effect of EE 21(7)(b) of the 2004 Act, while unclear, is clearly different from EG 11 of the 1994 Act.

No intended legislative change was included in Schedule 22A of the ITA 2004.

Section / Provision Income Tax Act 1994 EG 11
Status Finalised
Outcome

The panel has concluded that this is An unintended legislative change arises in respect of section EE 21(7) and (8) of the Income Tax Act 2004 – and carried over to the Income Tax Act 2007. 

Both the Income Tax Act 2004 and the Income Tax Act 2007 be amended retrospectively.


Back

 
Home | Contact Us | Background | Issues Log | Submission Form | Panel Statement | Maintenance Items Log |
www.govt.nz
Potential for ULC Background Contact Us Home