Potential for Unintended  Legislative Changes
  

 Overview of Process

 Submitting Issues

 Panel Process

 Analysis

 Content/form of  submissions

 Outcomes and  Communication

 Penalties and Interest

 Disputes and Rulings  Processes

 


www.rewriteadvisory.govt.nz

FYI Issues Log Panel Statement Submission Form Issues Log Home Contact Us Background
 

  The Issues Log






















 
Issue: CB 30, CB 26, EQ 1(1)

Submission Number 117
Submitter Chapman Tripp

Section / Provision Income Tax Act 2007

CB 30

Section / Provision Income Tax Act 2004

CB 26

Date Received

16/07/2009
Description of issue

 

A number of provisions in the Income Tax Act 2004 are subject to limitations or qualifications found in amending Acts. These have not been reproduced for the Income Act 2007. 

 

Give examples: Another example where an amending Act qualifies a section in the Income Tax Act 2004 is section 24(2) of the Taxation (Depreciation, Payment Dates Alignment, FBT, and Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 2006 which qualifies section CW 11C of the Income Tax Act 2004, but has not been reproduced for CW 13 of the Income Tax Act 2007.

Section / Provision Income Tax Act 1994 EQ 1(1)
Status Finalised
Outcome

The Panel concludes an unintended legislative change does not arise in respect of sections CB 30 and CW 13 of the Income Tax Act 2007 through the use of section ZA 3(2) of the Income Tax Act 2007.

RAP recommends IRD write a TIB item on section ZA 3(2) of the Income Tax Act 2007. 


Back

 
Home | Contact Us | Background | Issues Log | Submission Form | Panel Statement | Maintenance Items Log |
www.govt.nz
Potential for ULC Background Contact Us Home