Potential for Unintended  Legislative Changes
  

 Overview of Process

 Submitting Issues

 Panel Process

 Analysis

 Content/form of  submissions

 Outcomes and  Communication

 Penalties and Interest

 Disputes and Rulings  Processes

 


www.rewriteadvisory.govt.nz

FYI Issues Log Panel Statement Submission Form Issues Log Home Contact Us Background
 

  The Issues Log






















 
Issue: HC 6(1), OB 1

Submission Number 100
Submitter Hayes Knight NZ Limited

Section / Provision Income Tax Act 2007

HC 6(1)

Section / Provision Income Tax Act 2004

OB 1

Date Received

30/03/2009
Description of issue

Section HC 6(1) of the ITA 2007 requires income to be “paid” to a beneficiary within 6 months, whereas section OB 1 “beneficiary income” in the ITA 2004 stated ”pays or applies” which appears to be a substantial change.

We note that “paid” is not defined in the ITA 2007, however the “Defined in this Act”  note at the end of section HC 6 refers to “pay” but “pay” is not used in section HC 6.

The term “pays” was used in the ITA 2004 so perhaps this was an oversight in the drafting of the ITA 2007.

“Pay” is defined in YA 1 and includes “… to distribute … to credit … to deal with the amount” etc (essentially meaning applied). 

Section HC 6 is not recorded as an intentional change in Schedule 51 of the ITA 2007. 

Could you also clarify if there has been an unintended change in the legislation

Give examples: Pursuant to OB 1 of the ITA 2004, if dividends received by Trust A are credited by journal entry to Trust A’s beneficiary current accounts, this would constitute beneficiary income derived by the beneficiaries.

However, pursuant to the ITA 2007, in the scenario above, this would not constitute beneficiary income derived by the beneficiaries.

Section / Provision Income Tax Act 1994

OB 1

Status Pending
Outcome  

Back

 
Home | Contact Us | Background | Issues Log | Submission Form | Panel Statement | Maintenance Items Log |
www.govt.nz
Potential for ULC Background Contact Us Home